Mar 31, 2017

Documentary - intervju test

Today my group decided to do a test shoot for our interview to see how long it would take to rig and get ready for a shoot and to rig down and to test out the equipment we will be using.

Rigging up went pretty well and took about 40 minutes. We didn't get the big LED light for the test shot so we got more shadow on our test presenter and interviewee than we'd have if we had the big light. Another way we could have sorted out the shadows, especially the ones on the wall, could be to move the interviewee away from the fall. That way we would eliminate the big shadow behind Jason's head. Unfortunately, we didn't think of that when we were filming.
Another issue we had was that on one of the cameras we were planning to use (Canon 600D) didn't have the option of 'Kelvin' when choosing white balance. We therefore chose to use the uni's 7D instead since we need to be able to put the white balance on the same level on every camera when shooting multi-camera. Sound wise the set-up went pretty well. We decided to do the set-up with the clip mics on a zoom instead of using the TASCAM since using the zoom would be easier and the sound quality was still very good.

When editing the footage I noticed that some parts of the footage were grainy. We'll fix that when shooting the actual interview by using more lights, try to avoid dark areas with little light (if we can't fix it with the lights we have)  and to use lenses that have lower aperture when filming where there might be a risk of the footage being grainy.

Test shoot at uni from Trine Hagan on Vimeo.

The equipment we will be using for the interview is:
Camera:
- Canon 7D
- Canon 70D
- Canon 60D
Lenses:
- x2 50mm f/1.8
- 24-70mm f/2.8
- 70-200mm f/2.8
- Some standard lenses (f/4.5) and wide lenses
Sound:
- Zoom
- 2x Røde mics
- 2x Clip mics
- Boom mic
Lights:
- 2x Small LED lights
- 2x Ring lights
- Standard LED
Extra
- 2x batteries for every camera
- 2x Memory cards for every camera
- Reflector
- Shoulder rig

Mar 30, 2017

Documentary - Location Workshop

On Monday we had a workshop at the Historic Dockyard were we got separated into groups, given a location and asked to do a full risk assessment of the location and to make a short documentary.

My group were given the ship HMS Cavalier. Quick facts about the boat:
- Retired C-class destroyer of the Royal Navy.
- One of 96 War Emergency Programme destroyers ordered between 1940 and 1942.
- Commissioned on 22 November 1944, decommissioned in 1972
- Served in the WW2 and various commissions in the Far East
- After decommissioning she was preserved as a museum ship

Some of the risks we found at the location were confined space, steep stairs, members of public, surrounded by water and only 2 fire exits.

We decided to do an interview of one of the people working on the boat telling a bit of it's history and then walk around getting the GV's that we wanted. Because we were limited for time we didn't use as much tripod as we wanted since we needed quite a bit of coverage and felt we didn't have time to set up the tripod for every shot. That resulted in a lot of the footage being quite wobbly. We also forgot to set the white balance when we went inside the boat which resulted in the footage being too yellow-y.



On Wednesday we looked at the footage from Monday and discussed everyone's clips in class.
Helens quick filming-tips
- Pan max 45º
- Steady in/out
- Move from A to B
- Reveal
- Motivated moves
- Zoom - frame up
- Reset the camera before use
- Check the equipment for fingerprints/dirt
"It's better to have few good clips that you can use, than a lot of bad clips you can't use."

After the lesson we went to edit our footage into a short documentary. We chose George to edit while the rest of us worked on our main documentary 'Are we Numb'. Here's the finished edit of the footage from the Dockyard.

HMS CAVALIER from Trine Hagan on Vimeo.



//Source material and images\\

Mar 28, 2017

Award video - The FIRM Awards

Me and Gavin took on a Project for The FIRM quite a while ago. The project was to make the opening video to The FIRM Awards 2017.

The FIRM started as a LinkedIn Group in 2007 and has now nearly 8500 members in 71 countries. It's a supportive and collaborative community of corporate recruitment professionals who aim to support, develop and inspire their members.

As we didn't have much to work from for the video other than a couple of still pictures taken at last year's award we decided to use some of our own footage that we already had as well as going to London to get time-lapses and other footage. Gavin was in charge of talking to the commissioners, time-lapses and the titles while I did the main edit and was in charge of the GV's. We decided to make the film into somewhat of a guys travel showing a hooded character walking through London, breaking it up with some footage from different countries such as Whales, Norway, Italy and Spain, and back to the hooded guy where he gets closer and closer to the venue where the Award was talking place, ending the video with a time-lapse of the venue and the stills from last year's award. For the music we got a friend of ours in London to compose it.

Firm Awards 2017 - Opening Video from Gavin Roberts on Vimeo.


As a Thank You for the video we got invited to the award ceremony 23rd of March and got free accommodation in London. It was a great opportunity for networking as we met a lot of lovely and skilled people.  It was a great evening and I'm really happy to be part of the project and how the video turned out.



Mar 25, 2017

72 Hour Challenge

In early March me and Gavin signed up for BDF Marketing Communications and Events' 72 hour film challenge. The challenge was, as the name suggest, to create a film within 72 hours. The winning entries will be screened at their annual Film Festival on 20 June 2017.

Tuesday 21 March we were given the topic and had to Friday 5pm on Friday to send a finished project. The question was: "Business, technology, disability - how does technology showcase disabled talent."

The requirement for the challenge was:
- A team of minimum 1 person, maximum 5.
- Film length: 5-10 minutes
- Format: .AVI .MP4 or .WMV

Since we're in the middle of a documentary unit me and Gavin decided to make a documentary. That way we could use the challenge as practise for when we're going to go filming our actual project late April/early May. We decided to interview Joey Thompson who was in an accident and got confined to a wheelchair 2 years ago, and tell his story.



The equipment we decided to use was a ring light, 2 LED lights, 2 DSLRs, 2 tripods and 2 Røde mics which we plugged into the camera (more or less the same equipment that we are planning to use for our main project).
Filming went pretty well. Since we were filming with DSLRs it was easy to get all the GVs that we needed in a short amount of time. Filming the actual interview was a bit more of a problem as the batteries died quite quickly since we were doing a long, continuously shoot and the memory cards also got full too quickly. Luckily enough we had spare batteries, but no spare memory cards so we ended up having to spend time transferring the footage between shooting. It was a very nice experience as it opened our eyes for what we need to prepare for when shooting as neither me or Gavin thought we'd run out of battery or space on the memory cards that quickly. We are definitely bringing multiple batteries and SD cards when filming the actual project.

Since we had very limited time we were, in the beginning, debating whether or not to use lights since it would cost us extra time. Watching back I'm relly happy that we did decide to get lights, even though it was only some small ones. It ended up doing a massive difference erasing the shadows under the interviewee's eyes.

Here is a short version of the finished documentary:
The "Wheelchair man" - Short from Trine Hagan on Vimeo.

Looking at the documentary now I'm pretty pleased with what we managed to make, but I'm sad we weren't able to focus more on the technology part of the task that was given. But overall I'm very happy with the storytelling, the footage and the fact that we managed to pull it off only using our own equipment and having 72 hours at our disposal.

Documentary - Sequences and actuality

Directing documentaries
- Documentaries do not "just happen". They have to be researched, meticulously planned, scripted and set up.
- Control is the key throughout the pre, production and post-production process.

Sequences
- Just as with drama, we direct sequences for documentaries which (based on careful research) represent reality.
- Close ups are key. Repeat the action and beware continuity.
- Make sure the sequences are interesting, creative and relevant, and properly set up for light and sound.
- Wherever possible shoot sequences with a tripod.

Sequencing contributors & talent
- When dealing with paid talent you can usually ask them to do whatever you creatively want for the film (within reason). When dealing with the members of the public this is potentially more tricky.
- Ensure you have talked through your plans with them prior to the shoot so that you know they are happy with arrangements.
- Gaining trust is key to dealing with 'real' people, this is built up during the production process.
- Your research should highlight potential actuality and relevant sequences which will "tell the story in pictures" so you can plan this in your shooting script.



Get good coverage - shoot to edit
- The art is to get as many options as possible for your edit.
- I.e shoot lots of different angles which will cut together for continuity.
- Remember the rule of 3 close ups for every wide shot - break each shot into action and reaction shots to give good coverage.

Get cutaways
- To ensure that you can always "cover" your edits, it is essential to shoot cutaways.
- GVs (general views) are a great way of doing this.
- They are generic shots which are relevant to the subject and location which can be slotted in anywhere in the edit.
- They need to be either close ups or defocused wides.
- It's important not to forget framing/composition.

Ensure there is continuity of Mise en scene
- Ensure each shot matches the next.
- Position of the subject in the scene must look as similar as possible.
- This includes costumes, props, lighting and colour.

Continuity of performance & orientation
- Performers need to ensure their delivery is also as similar as possible each time you re-take on a different shot size/angle.
- Pace, emotional delivery and even eyelines must match,
- Remember the 180 rule of orientation.

Match action edits
- Cutting on action is the best way to achieve the illusion of continuity.
- Cut whilst the action is in progress and pick up the movement on the incoming shot before it's completed.
- Editing between different size versions of the same shot necessitates matching the action.
- You will need to find the best exit point of the outgoing shot and the best in point on the incoming shot to give the illusion of a continuous movement.
- The feeling of continuity is emphasised by this method.


- Shooting this way will allow you to edit separate repeated angles to create the perception of continuity.
- If done well the edits are "invisible".

Actuality
- Actuality is a type of documentary filming which captures events and does little if anything to control them - realism. Therefore, in contrast to sequencing, you will not directing the action but responding to it.
- Thus actuality is very difficult to film and thus to edit. You cannot control the action so therefore controlling your camera and what you shoot is even more important.
- They are often shot handheld to improve responsiveness and flexibility. In fact conventions have evolved whereby the "wobbly" look of actuality is expected and adds to the sense of "reality" and events unfolding unfettered by the production team.
- Thus planning is vital for such shots. You need to do a careful recce so that you are aware of potential challenges during the shoot and can devise ways of dealing with them.

Actuality shooting strategies
- Letting the subject enter and leave the frame.
- Apply the rules of sequencing by controlling what and how you shoot.
- Filming plenty of reaction shots.
- Filming cutaways, establishing shots and non-sync wide shots.
- Always getting GVs/cutaways.
- Only shoot what you need.
- Plan use of sound kit carefully e.g radio mics on main character(s).
- Always get wildtrack/buzz.

Brief your camera OP
- By careful discussion prior to filming and through keeping your eye, not only on the events before you, but in the way in which they are being recorded, you can maintain a degree of control without interfering with events, but it's a careful balancing act to be learnt through experience.

Why do we need sequencing and actuality?
- It conveys a better feeling of 'real life'.
- Engaging the viewer - pace (faster than interview sync heavy).
- Helps to edit an illustrate interview sync clips.
- What starts out as a 30 minutes long interview will inevitably end up largely on the cutting room floor in a bid to reduce the interview to a duration possibly of a quarter of that length.

Visible or invisible director?
Reflexivity - The technique of exposing the filmmaking process, thus distancing itself from the personal authorship in making documentaries.
Self-reflexivity - Exposes not only the process of making film, but also the authors' own views and the journey they themselves make.
- Thus the director can become part of the film itself and takes on a more active role in the film.
- By making your own assumptions clear the viewer is empowered with a new understanding of the 'truth' unfolding before them.

Nick Broomfield's 'Aileen - Life and Death of a Serial Killer'
Nick Broomfield, Biog:
- Studied law, political science and finally attended the National Film School
- First film shoot in 1971 whilst at film school called 'Who Cares' and was about slum clearance in Liverpool.
- He originally made observational documentaries and stumbled across his now signature style of placing himself within the film itself to make sense of his film 'Driving Me Crazy'.
- Recently adopted what he describes as 'direct cinema' style in which real people play themselves in docu-drama-style- e.g 2006 film 'Ghosts' for Channel 4.
Most well known film - 'Kurt and Courtney'.
- He has won numerous awards for his work including British Academy Lifetime Achievement Award for his contribution to documentary film making.

Background of the film:
- In 1991 Nich Broomfield made a film, 'Aileen Wuornos: The selling of a serial Killier' which was about the family of America's first female serial killer, Aileen Wuornos, who were trying to sell her story to the highest bidder. Curiously it was Aileen herself who emerged as the most principled member of the family.
- He subsequently remained in contact with her, writing to her until she was sent to subpoena to appear in the final state appeal before her execution.
- Broomfield decided to make this, the second film, looking at her tortured childhood and life as a prostitute.
- Charlize Theron used Broomfield's documentaries about Aileen as the basis for her Oscar winning portrayal of the serial killer in the motion picture 'Monser'.


My thought on the documentary
After watching the documentary I ended up liking it more than I thought I would. Aileen's childhood and her relationship to her family, dad who got sent to prison few years after she was born, abandoned by her mother and Tyra who went behind her back to help out on a movie deal makes an interesting, heartbreaking and engaging story.  It's easy to feel sympathy for Aileen even though you know she's a serial killer after hearing about everything she's been through. It's also interesting to see how cases like hers are being handled compared to how it would be handled if the same thing happened in Norway where there is no death sentence.  

I liked how all the interviews were done on location, the use of GV's, POV, archive footage and how the story follows her and builds up to the execution. Having the presenter in frame gives a very "real" feeling to the documentary as you then get to see the presenters feeling and hear the presenters thoughts, although that also gives the feel that the presenter has sacrificed some of his objectivity sometimes in the doc.

What surprised me camera-wise was the amount of times they used zoom to get from wide to close up. This might be either because Broomfield was limited to one camera and didn't want to cut in fear of losing important details or because of the time he was taken to court for how he edited his first film and didn't want to be accused of making lies in his documentary. Another part that surprised me was some footage from an interview where the boom is clearly visible in the corner of the screen made it to the final edit of such a big documentary. But other than that it was a nicely shot documentary, and even though it might feel a bit distracting with the zoom and boom at some points it never makes you loose focus of what's actually happening in the story.

Trailer:





//Images\\

Mar 23, 2017

Documentary - GoPro test drive

Since we're going to film the presenter travelling between different locations we'll be filming quite a bit inside a car of him driving. We were planning to do different hand-held shots to get a lot of coverage, but were then made aware of the rules there are when filming in a moving vehicle while being under the educational system:

Checklist for filming inside a moving vehicle:
- A comprehensive Risk Assessment must be carried out prior to filming anything with a moving vehicle.
- All relevant vehicle legislation must be complied with and safety checks carried out.
- The competence of all drivers should be assessed in relation to the activity they are to be involved in and fully briefed beforehand on what's required.
- Everyone must remain seated and restrained properly while the vehicle is in motion, and loose equipment must be appropriately secured.
- Drivers should remain focused on the road at all times and keep both hands on the wheel.
- Use only foxed-position cameras (such as GoPro's) while the vehicle is in motion. Hand-held cameras are only to be used while the vehicle is stationary. 
- When filming vehicles on a public road, camera equipment and crew must remain at least 1 metre away from the edge of the road.

Because of this we'll be using GoPro's as the main cameras instead of DSLRs while the presenter is driving since, but use DSLR to get close ups showing details such as when the presenter is changing gear, turning on the radio, turning the steering wheel etc, while the vehicle is standing still.

To get and idea of what it'll look like we decided to do a test ride to find out where we should place the camera and how we would be able to record the sound the best way possible.





The footage we got turned out really grainy as we were rushed and didn't really have time to fiddle with the settings on the camera. We tried filming in 4K which was probably partly the reason why the footage was grainy. When placing the GoPro we tried having it in front of the driver at first, but discovered that it would be too distracting for the driver and moved it to his right side.

Sound wise we decided to use clip mics since they won't be very visible and is fairly easy to monitor. from the back seat. We are currently debating whether or not to use 2 GoPro's instead of one to have more to cut between, although that will make it harder for the crew to hide in the back seat, and thinking of which settings we should use for the GoPro.

Mar 22, 2017

Documentary - Pitch

Are we numb?

“Over 11 Million people were killed in the Holocaust, making it the biggest murder in the history of the world. But 70 years later, have we become numb to what happened?”

Story synopsis
With cases of young people disrespecting the Holocaust memorial, stealing from Auschwitz, mocking and making light of what happened during the Holocaust. Liam Alexandru travels to London to investigate whether the young generation really has become numb to the murder or 11 million people. Talking with experts from the Imperial War Museum on what happened during the Holocaust and traveling over to Berlin to visit the Holocaust Memorial and to talk to artist Shahak Shapira, who took the internet with his project ‘Yolocaust’ to stop people disrespecting the memorial. Have we become numb? Do we think light of what happened all those years ago? Liam aims to find out.



Why are we telling this story?
Are we, as a generation, numb to the past?
That’s something we want to find out and something that BBC 3 has yet to cover. 
The Holocaust happened over 70 years ago, and over 11 million people were murdered. The current generation of young people may not have a connection to the second World War or have grandparents who fought in the war and therefore don’t feel as strongly about this as they should. As well as schools not teaching about the Holocaust to children, unless they chose to study the subject in either GCSE or A level academic years. This has led to events where young people have been stealing shoes from Auschwitz, taking inappropriate selfies at the memorial and making jokes about the Holocaust, which we have all seen and experienced. This story is to find out if we really are numb to what is the biggest mass murder in the history of the world. So many documentaries, films and TV Programmes have covered what happened and those who suffered by it. But, not covered today’s opinion on it. Specifically, we with who joke and make light of it and why they do that. 

Character profiles
Presenter – Liam Alexandru
21 years old, British, actor
Liam has had a lot of experience both on stage and in front of the camera, and will therefore be confident being filmed. He also takes a great interest in history, including the Holocaust, studying it for his A-level examinations. Liam has just got back from a trip to Berlin, with his step-sister who is studying Hebrew and Jewish Major at Barcelona University; in terms of historical knowledge he is well educated. He is familiar with the area in which we are filming, which will only improve his confidence. Liam is in the correct age bracket to be able to talk and relate to teens, who will be the target audience for this documentary.

‘Yolocaust” artist – Shahak Shapira
29 years old, Israeli but lives in Germany, artist/writer
Shahak is well known for his opposition to extremism and his website “Yolocaust” where he photoshopped pictures of people taking selfies or inappropriate pictures at the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin. People had been taking pictures of themselves doing Yoga or Juggling whilst some teens had been jumping over the concrete slabs, one even captioning his picture “Jumping on dead Jews” as a joke.

He did this to a total of 12 images. His website was visited over 2.5 million times and all twelve people who were in the pictures reached out to Shahak to apologize, one stating that he was an idiot and just trying to make a joke which was in very bad taste.

Proposed locations
- Hotel lounge in Berlin (awaiting to be confirmed)
For our interview with Shahak. He doesn’t want to be filmed at the memorial or his house. We have therefore decided to use the hotel lounge where we will be staying as it has a nice background and it’s quite big.
- Holocaust memorial in Berlin (confirmed)GV’s for Shahak’s interview, walkie talkie with the presenter and interview with an expert working at the memorial.
- The Imperial War Museum (awaiting to be confirmed)Filming in an office for an interview of an expert.
- Inside a car (confirmed)
Filming the presenter traveling to different locations.
- Airport (confirmed)
Showing bits of the presenter’s travel.



Approach/style
For our documentary, the style is intentionally BBC Three. BBC three produces content that has purpose, that stimulates emotions and provokes reactions, particularly from young people. For the documentary, we want to approach the topic as an investigative documentary with our narrator, Liam Alexandru, finding out whether our generation is growing numb to the holocaust and our past. We will also test out having an Edgar Right Style to our documentary, in terms of montage and quick cuts – when our character is traveling from England to Berlin.

For the Interviews, we want to film them as a conversation, incorporating the narrator as a character rather than just a voice, this would be like how Louis Theroux approaches difficult subjects, and isn't afraid to tackle them.

For GV’s, we’ll be doing establishing- and inside the car-shots, use archive footage and photos (awaiting confirmation), some drone shots of locations, walkie-talkie shots with the presenter, stock photos/footage of Berlin (the wall, streets, people etc.)





//Images

Mar 19, 2017

Documentary - Research

I desided to research 3 documentaries to look at the different style of documentary making and to get a better idea for what style I want to go for with my idea. I decided to research 'The internet's own boy' (2014), 'McCullin' (2012) and 'Bowling for Columbine', 3 very different documentaries, both in term of style and context.


"The internet's own boy" (2014), directed and produced by Brian Knappenberger, is an American biolographical documentary about the programming prodigy and information activist Aaron Swartz. Swartz helped in the development of the basic internet protocol RSS, co-funding of Reddit and his fingerprints can be found all over the internet. The documentary is telling the story of his groundbreaking work in social justice and political organising combined with his aggressive approach to information access which landed him in a two year legal nightmare - ending up with him taking his own life at the age of 26. His story touched a nerve with people far beyond the online communities in which he was a celebrity.

The documentary is a very personal story about what we lose when we are tone deaf about technology and its relationship to our civil liberties.
The film is narrated by people from Swartz's life including his mother, brother, girlfriends co-workers and other people connected to him in one way or another such as Tim Berners-Lee who's known as the inventor of the World Wide Web.

The Internet's Own Boy - Theatrical Trailer from Hammer Creative on Vimeo.

The documentary premiered in the 2014 Sundance Film Festival and served as the opening film at the 2014 Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival. It also won the "Sheffield Youth Jury Award" at Sheffield Doc/Fest same year. It received positive response from critics, a 93% rating with an average score of 7.3 on Rotten Tomatoes.

The film is a good, but a bit of a heavy watch. The story is told by interviews, V.O, some actuality e.g when the brother is showing Swartz's old room and archive footage of interviews and other clips from when Swartz was still alive. The crew, interviewer and the director can't be seen in the doc, but there's a few times you can hear the interviewer when he's asking a question to the interviewee.


"McCullin"(2012), directed by David Morris and Jacqui Morris, tells the story of Don McCullin who's classed by many as the greatest living war photographer and often cited as an inspiration for today's photojournalists. In the documentary we see him, for the first time, talking about his career of covering wars and humanitarian disasters on almost every continent, a career that lasted him three decades. From 1969 to 1984 McCullin was the Sunday Times of London's star photographer, covering stories from the civil war in Cyprus to the war i Vietnam, from the man-made famine in Biafra to the plight of the homeless in the London of the swinging sixties.
The documentary does not only explore McCullin's life and work, but also how the ethos of journalism has changed throughout his career. It shows the history of photojournalism told trough the lens of one of its most acclaimed photographers.

McCullin official UK trailer - in cinemas & Curzon on Demand from 1 January from Curzon Artificial Eye on Vimeo.

The documentary was nominated for "Outstanding Debut by a British Writer, Director or Producer" and "Best Documentary" at the 66th British Academy Film Awards. It also won the award for "Best Use of Footage in a Cinema Release" at the 2014 Focal International Awards. It has a 100% rating and an average rating of 7.3?10 at Rotten Tomatoes.

I love the story telling aspect of the documentary and find it inspiring how they have managed to make a very interesting, emotional and powerful feature length documentary by interviewing only 2 people; Don McCullin himself and Sir Harold Evans, former editor at the Sunday Times. You never see any crew or any interviewer. The documentary is only focusing on McCullin's story, revealing the honest truth about wars and tragedies.

There's a powerful atmosphere in the documentary from the beginning to the end. What dominates the documentary is the black-and-white still images taken by McCullin. They engrave themselves on our minds and McCullin talks about them in an honest way, revealing a powerful story to every image. Other than the still images the documentary consists of a lot of archive footage from different wars and conflicts, and very little actuality. The V.O used in the doc mainly is taken from the interviews with McCullin, but also the interview with Evans and clips from archive footage and radio.


"Bowling for Columbine" (2002), directed by the political documentary filmmaker Michael Moore. In the documentary Moor himself goes to explore the circumstances that lead to the 1999 Columbine High School massacre. He documents how two student easily acquired four pieces of fire arms, despite of having a history of arrests, juvenile detention, counselling sessions and drug dependencies. With his signature sense of angry humour Moore take a deep examination of America's culture of fear, bigotry and violence in a nation with wide spread gun ownerships. He explore how the U.S has ended up as the country with the highest number of gun related killings on Earth, interviewing people such as Charlton Heston (former president of the National Rifle Association) and showing examples of a bank giving a free gun by just opening a bank account.

The documentary brought Moore international attention as a rising filmmaker and won numerous awards including Academy Awards for "Best Documentary Feature", the Independent Spirit Award for "Best Documentary Feature" and the César Award for "Best Foreign Film". "Bowling for Columbine" is considered to be one of the greatest documentary of all time.

Pivot - Bowling for Columbine :30 TV Spot "What Is It?" from Adam Silver on Vimeo.

The title of the film refers to the story that Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, the two students responsible for the Columbine High School massacre, attended a school bowling class 6 am on the day they committed the attacks on the school. Moore refers to the concept of bowling later in the film as well, both in interviews and the Michigan Militia use bowling pins for their target practise.

Moore uses a lot of humour in the documentary, eg clips of stand up comedians and montages. About 20 minutes in the film we can hear the Beatles song "Happiness Is a Warm Gun" playing during a montage where we see people buying guns, residents of Virgin, Utah, a town that passed a law requiring all residents to own guns, people firing rifles at carnivals and shooting ranges, Denise Ames operating a rifle, Gary Plauche killing Jeff Doucet who had killed and molested Plauche's son, a man who takes his shirt off and is shot during a riot and more. Even though there are a lot of humorous elements in the film there's never a point where you as a viewer feel that this isn't a serious documentary, covering a serious topic. It's more like the humorous elements underlines how ridiculous some of the laws, that the documentary covers, are and how crazy some of the "reasons" behind these gun laws are when you look at the statistics of number of people killed by guns in U.S compared to other countries.

The documentary is very well made, interesting and keeps the audience's attention at all times. Michael Moore does a brilliant job as a presenter, as usual, not pretending to be an expert but instead asking the questions like any normal human would. The only voice over you hear in the documentary is Moore and even though some of the interviewees are spotted multiple times in the documentary it's only Moore that you are following through the entire doc.



I like the colour, the music and the way they underline the seriousness in McCullin and I would like to try to do something similar with the documentary for this unit. In all of his interviews he's placed in locations with interesting backgrounds that underlines who he is as a character, but without being distracting. Similar to "McCullin" we'll also most likely be using archive footage and images. I like the way they're doing it in the documentary by having the pictures standing still with black bars on the side. It gives the impression "this is the truth, this is how it is". There isn't any effects on the sides of the image it's just black bars to fill the frame, and the image is standing completely still, it isn't moving to make it more "interesting" to look at. When we are showing the images we want to use we need to decide whether we want to show them in a "fancy way" or in a, maybe, less fancy but more "honest" way.

Both "The internet's Own Boy" and "Bowling for Columbine" shows multiple different characters,  which is probably the same as we'll be doing with this documentary. It's therefore interesting to see the ways they use to introduce the different characters and how they make the transitions between each character.

In terms of presenter or not I really like style of "Bowling for Columbine" where you follow one character on a journey to find find out something/solve a problem. I'd like to do a similar style for "Are we numb" to have a presenter go on a journey and talk to people to find out whether our generation are being numb or not.




//Source material\\

Mar 17, 2017

Documentary - Scripting and storytelling for docs

Today we looked at the footage from the interview workshop on Wednesday getting feedback on the sound, white balance, exposure, focus and framing. We then looked at a clip where freelance producer/director Jonothan McLeod was talking about how to get clear sound when self-shooting. http://www.bbc.co.uk/academy/production/television/self-shooting/article/art20130702112135342

Scripting and storytelling
- All programming is to a lesser or greater extent scripted.
- Factual programmes face particular ethical challenges when it comes to how far they should be scripted and the ethical questions relating to the constructed nature of the genre.

Title
The title is important as it:
- Sells your film to its audience - 'tease'
- Encapsulates what your film is about
- Focuses you as a producer/director on the real meaning of your film
- Adds meaning to your film - 'double entendre' common e.g One Born Every Minute - new conventions re: blunt literal titles e.g The Boy Whose Skill Fell Off.

The treatment
The treatment should outline how you want to tell the story:
- Main characters/interviewees
- Locations
- Style/format
- Narrative structure
- Whether using a presenter/reporter
The treatment should also include:
- Transmission ("TX") time and channel/platform
- Target audience
- Whether it's a stand-alone film, part of an existing strand or series, or is split into parts to form a new series

Documentary scripting can utilise:
- Sequences
- Interviews
- Reconstructions and dramatisations
- Actuality
- Cutaways/GVs
- Sync
- Commentary
- Music
- Archive/stills
- Graphics
Documentary should be as much about the pictures as any other film. Show and tell, don't just tell.

Shooting Scripts
- Written prior to filming
- Forms the template of the finished film
- Should be informed by your research and allow you to effectively think through your film's picture and sound content and a basic structure

Script example:














Starting
- Always start by writing your commentary and interview with a summary of each person's sync e.g Fred describes his life in London (research informs your comm).
- Explore picture opportunities through your script.
- Always write to pictures - they should work together - synergy of woods and pictures.

Scripting conventions 
e.g write COMM or V/O for commentary
- SEQ = sequence
- ACT = actuality
- C/A = cutaway
- SYNC = interview clips
- SFX = sound effects
Commentary is usually made distinct by being written in italics/in bold, also helps during voiceover record if they are numbered.
Line and a half spacing (makes it easier to read)

Developing your story - finding the narrative
- Finding a narrative for your documentary is essential.
- A central thread of some kind which will hold your story together e.g Day in the life/Jurney of exploration.
- The central thread could involve the process of investigating the answer to a particular question or theory.
- The film's narrative is influenced by the characters, location, period of time it's covering and the events presented.
- Time-based narratives can't be fractured. Ensure you check the logic of your story and keep to it.

Narrative- light, shade and tension
- Consider how you will inject light and shade. It's important to consider the overall experience of watching your film.
- Tension is a key element pf storytelling, adding suspense and drama. These should be identifies during the research process if possible.
Ways to create tension:
- Scripting (voiceover), emphasise dramatic moments and tease.
- Bringing together opposing groups/individuals within the film.
- Real events - e.g on a raid with the police in Police, Camera, Action.

Commentary in documentary
- Guide/explain the story
- Information/expertise
- Intro of character
- Tension
- Corner turn

We were shown a clip from ITV's 'Police, Camera, Action', showing the police is fighting drug use in the UK. The whole clip is shot handheld, with cameras attached to the police's bodies.
While watching we were asked to focus on the commentary in the clip and the actuality.

Narrative styles 
- There are a number of narrative styles which can be used in documentary filmmaking.
- The documentary filmmaker might become the film's protagonist or investigator e.g Michael Moore or Nick Broomfield films.
- The method of storytelling is determined by what is appropriate for the content, the programme/series/channel identity and by the preference of the film's producer/director.

Narrative devices - Actuality driven narrative vs sequenced Narratives
Actuality driven: 
- This is a term used to describe more observational type films whose structure and storytelling develops around what happens, the developing of events drives the story and provides the narrative e.g 'One Born Every Minute'/'Cops with Cameras'.
Sequenced documentary films
- Have a more "polished" feel and are typically more formatted pieces e.g who do you think you are? (Although this also is driven by the "actuality" of  journey of discovery).

The choice as to whether or not the film is entirely actuality driven, partially actuality driven or completely scripted depends on the subject, type of programme/series and audience.
The filmmaker will also potentially have their own views on this based on preference/style/"morals".

Subject driven and character driven films explained
- When choosing your subject you might find it seems a little "dry".
- If the subject takes over and drives the entire film the end result can feel a little "didactic" i.e like a lecture or visual essay.
- Character driven films use characters to tell a story. They are able to encapsulate the essential elements of your subject without resulting to purely didactic methods.
- Many of the best films can combine the best elements of both with the subject and argument at the heart of the film, but with the benefit of characters to breathe life, soul and even drama into your film.

Script and shot lists
- Your script can inform the shot list of the sequences, interviews, actuality and GV's etc you use for each day's filming.
- As with any film, events may need to be shot out of sequence with your script and crafted later in the edit.

Edit prep
Effective preparations for the edit are:
- Viewing and accurately naming all rushes in relevant bins - shot type, sequences, actuality, interviews, cutaways, establishing shots, opening/closing sequences etc.
- Transcripts, fully typed and time coded transcripts of interviews are invaluable. They speed up the process of preparing for your edit, as you can pre-select the clips ("sync") you want and cut and paste it into your edit script.
- Type relevant time codes onto your edit script so that you can quickly locate shots.
- Organise the material into bins to make the process more efficient.

Final script
- The script will continue to develop along with your film, it would therefore be smart to save each version of the script as a new file number e.g V1, V2, V3 and so on until the final script and add the date.
It's important to keep your script in sync with updates through the edit because:
- Efficiency, you can continue to prep on paper outside the edit.
- Should something go wrong with the edit you have a fully typed up record of it so your film could be re-cut.
- It can be used for prep and during the edit by the voice over artist.

Copyright
- Copyright applies to all artistic works which have been created and preserved in some lasting way. E.g written work, film, video, photographs, theatrical works, music, paintings, sculptures, images and so on.
- It exists to protect the creator's ownership and right to exploit future uses and re-uses of their works for copying, publishing and selling them on etc.
- When works are registered officially for copyright they are then able to be defended legally for damages, loss of profit and any related legal fees.
- Intellectual property (IP) operates within the legal framework of individual countries.

Structured Reality: A script too far?
- Structured or scripted reality is a hybrid form of factual programming which relates to an increasingly popular form of the medium which utilises 'real people' and 'real places' but which weaves plot lines which are 'prompted' by the programme's producers for the characters around 'real events'.
- Storylines are then recorded with the sort of glossy production values usually reserved for Soap operas.
- Successful programmes in this genre include 'The Only Way is Essex" and "Made in Chelsea".
- There has been some debate over whether these programmes rightly belong within the documentary genre or if they are somehow a pollution of the form taking the scripted and constructed nature of documentary way beyond what's acceptable.
- It prompted a BAFTA debate on the subject "Is Structured Reality corrupting Documentary?".




//Images\\

Mar 16, 2017

Documentary - Benefits streets

Benefits Street is a documentary series that was broadcasted on Channel 4 in early 2014 and ran for 5 episodes. In the programme they're documenting the life of several residents of  James Turner Street in Birmingham, where newspapers such as Daily Mail and The Guardian reported that 90% of the residents claim benefits and Channel 4 described as one of Britain's most benefit-dependent streets".  

In the first episode we're being introduced to the residents of the streets. Some are seen committing crimes such as shop lifting and attempting to raise money to support themselves and families. Shoplifter Danny is being returned to prison after breaking and anti-social behaviour order, while Fugi, another resident, takes free magazines from a hotel lobby and tries to sell them on the streets.
The programme also shows a demonstration of how to steal designer clothes and remove the security tags. The programme also sets focus on the street's sense of community, showing "White-Dee" styled as the "mother" of the street taking responsibility in helping others, giving people advice and attempts to help Fugi with his drug habit.

Even though the programme shows both the ups and downs of living on benefits it harvested a lot of criticism. Some said the programme was like an "old Victorian freak show" or "Poverty porn"saying the programme misrepresented the residents showing them as "lazy", living on benefits and not trying to get a job. Other's threatened violence towards the residents in the programme, where on Twitter you could find comments such as "I want to walk down £BenefitsStreet with a baseball bat and brain a few of these scum bags."

The documentary is narrated by Tony Hirst and presented in a fly-on-the-wall documentary format that follows a year in the lives of the residents of James Turner Street. It's shot by using a lot of handheld camerawork and natural lighting, making the documentary look realistic and gritty. They've also used a lot of close up's to underline people's feelings.

I liked the camera work, the style of storytelling and that they make it feel realistic and not staged, and the characters. That said, I'm not too fan of the series as a whole as I find myself agreeing with a lot of the criticism of the programme saying that they painted an unfair picture of the residents.




//Images and source material\\

Essay workshop 2

Assessment Criteria
- Knowledge of historical periods and ideas.
- Knowledge of theoretical framework around perception 'language' and meaning.
- Understanding through application of: research skills and information collation in the support and development of critical study.
- Understanding through application of: ability to structure arguments and present as an essay using academic conventions.
- Basic project management skills.

What makes a successful essay?
- Relevance to title
- Reasoned argument
- Use of source materials including texts
- Appropriate presentation

Main sections of an Essay
Introduction
Main Body
Conclusion

Introduction Elements
- Background information
- Links to title through words and key concepts
- Definition of terms
- Claim

What is expected in the main body?
- What does a discussion include?
Investigation or examination of an argument; sift and debate; give reasons for and against; examine implications.
- How to construct an argument: 
Make a claim, explain and use evidence (source materials) informed/researched opinions of others.
- What to leave out: 
Anything that doesn't relate to the essay question.

Source material 
Informed/researched opinions of others.
Why use source material?
In academic writing you are required to use other people's ideas. This is an important way of learning about your subject. It's a key way to a successful essay.

How to use source materials in an essay
Use source materials to:
- Learn about people's ideas through reading and making notes.
- Identify key ideas in form of quotations and paraphrases.
- Integrate the quotations and paraphrases into your essay. You should link them with the argument and make clear your own opinion about them.

Take a position
- The reader needs to be able to follow your points clearly.
- Remember you need to present more than 1 side of an argument.

Why take a position
The point isn't only "Can you follow the argument", but also "Do you agree with the argument".

What is a written argument?
Arguments are made up of two main elements - claims and bases.
To make a claim convincing, there needs to be a basis for it. In a written argument, there are two main kinds of basis:
- Theory and research carried out by an expert.
- Clear reasoning which shows clear thinking and logic. Successful arguments bring claims, explanations and evidence together in a convincing text.

What is the purpose of the conclusion?
- The purpose of the conclusion is to: show that you have answered the essay question/title. What was the point of the essay.
- It can summarise the main points in support of the claim: and it can show the added value that the argument in the essay has created.

Think about when making the essay
- What does the essay title mean?
- What is it asking you to do?
- What are the possible positions you could take when writing the essay?
- What reading can you do for it?
- What content can go into the essay?
- What images can you use?

Structuring the essay
- Be clear about what the title means
- Read relevant source material
- Use works connected to te title
- Identify key concepts to use in your writing
- Propose a general argument
- Outline the organisation of the writing
- Structure your writing: claim, explanation, evidence.




//All images from Google.com\\

Contextual studies - Representation

Today we started the lesson by watching an episode of Game of Thrones, Battle of the Bastards (season 6, episode 9) - which is regarded as the best episode of the series.

What do we mean by 'Virtualism'
- In media context, the simulation of 'the real': primarily through digital construct and manipulation.
- The aesthetic tension between physical and digital; material vs immaterial; 'the uncanny valley'.

Virtualism in visual media 
- Game of thrones, fantasy drama
- Dramatic elements (narrative & character) relies on realism
- Fantasy (non-realist) elements relies on digital constructs



Virtualism in visual media
- Sanctuary, fantasy/sci-fi drama
- Dramatic elements (narrative & character) relies on realism
- Visual context (environment) entirely digital



- 'Virtual' news sets are purely representational.
- Simulated reality; we decode by genre symbols.

Aesthetic tension
- What's 'real'?
- What's 'created'?
- Analogue (practical) or digital?
- How do we perceive difference?

'The uncanny'
"An uncanny effect often arises when the boundary between fantasy and reality is blurred" - Freud, 'The Uncanny' (19190)
- Heimlich, the familiar and comfortable
- Unheimlich, the unfamiliar and strange

'The uncanny valley'
- Following Freud's theory, the perceptual gap between that which is perceived as 'real' and that which is 'almost real' (or a close simulacrum)
- Provokes aesthetic sense of discomfort, eeriness or revulsion.




//Images from Google.com\\